Why the Zendaya Spider-Man Movie Controversy Isn’t a Big Deal to Me… and Shouldn’t Be to You

It seems there’s been a slow-burning uproar the last few days, since The Wrap posted an article leaking the alleged “real” role that young actress Zendaya has been cast for the upcoming film Spider-Man: Homecoming.  In it, the article states that Zendaya, a young woman of color, will be playing the role of Mary Jane Watson, whom Spider-Man fans know to be the most iconic and well-known of Spider-Man’s love interests.  In response, many fanboys–most of them white, of course–have taken to various social medias and websites to vent their collective outrage over this decision by the powers at Sony.

As a Spider-Man super fan myself, I’ve been aware of this announcement since it went live, and somewhat vaguely aware of the “backlash” that’s resulted.  To be perfectly honest, it’s hard for me to get worked up over this issue, for a number of reasons.

  1. MJ’s race doesn’t fucking matter!  I love the way I’ve seen most of the racists coding their response to this one.  They know damn well they can’t openly say, “I’m angry because MJ shouldn’t be black!”, so instead they attack her hair color.  “MJ should be a redhead!” they shout.  It’s purely code for saying she should be white, which is complete and utter bullcrap.  I’ll say here what I’ve said elsewhere: with very few exceptions, there are almost no Marvel comic book characters whose origins and backstories demand they be white.  The Human Torch.  Doctor Strange.  Iron Fist.  Hell, Iron Man, for that matter.  And Spider-Man, as well as his supporting cast.  Anyone who claims these characters must be exactly as they have been portrayed in the comics is saying so from a position of privileged ignorance
  2. It’s not official, at least not yet.  The Wrap article, while it has certainly touched off a minor firestorm with this alleged development, can’t actually be officially taken at its word… yet.  Until Marvel or Sony comments one way or the other, this is just a high-profile piece of gossip from a website.  Does it sound like something Marvel would do?  Yes it does.  Does it seem like a logical development to include MJ in the Spider-Man films?  Totally.  Would Zendaya be the proper age to play MJ in a high school iteration of Spider-Man?  Hell yes.  But until we hear something official, we may be getting wound up over nothing.
  3. The racists are clearly losing, anyway.  There’s been more focus on the backlash against the backlash.  I’ve seen articles where Twitter trolls get schooled for their coded comments about Zendaya’s race, and hair color.  Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn has defended the concept of a person of color playing MJ, very eloquently citing need for our movies to reflect the diversity of the world in which we live.  The “controversy” surrounding this hypothetical piece of casting is really nothing more than the slowly, noticeably, deteriorating yelling of the privileged racists whose voices are becoming less and less important as time goes on.  The powers at Marvel and Sony are not listening, and continuing to make movies and shows that prove to be highly successful, both financially and critically.

On a personal note, if Zendaya is indeed portraying MJ in Spider-Man: Homecoming, I am a-okay with this, in exactly the way I would have been okay with a Peter Parker who had been cast as a person of color.  I’m not familiar with her work, but I will say that she does look stunning, and I’m willing to bet that Marvel and Sony would be putting her in the role because they know she can do the character justice.  To me, that’s all that matters, and Marvel has long since earned my trust in these areas.

If Zendaya is MJ, bring it on!  I’m sure she’ll be wonderful.

Writing Goals for the Rest of 2016

I’ve recently made a significant change to my life, going from full-time work to a part-time position that is both less stressful and which gives me more time to devote to more creative pursuits.  While I think I’ve gotten good about managing my time over the last few months, I’m trying especially hard to keep my nose to the grindstone with regard to being both more creative and more productive with that creativity, given my newfound extra time.  I therefore went and gave myself a few goals to hit by the end of this year.

  • Do one of the following three things, every day:
    • Write at least 500 words.  That’s the bare minimum, not a finish-line goal for the day.  Getting words written and looking/sounding passable for an audience is one way I’ve found to keep the creative juices flowing.  It could take the form of blog posts (like this one), creative nonfiction (like my reviews on Superior Spider-Talk), or other creative works that don’t get immediately posted.
    • Draw a one-page comic or illustration.  Or part of a comic.  You get the idea.  I’m no great artist, but I wish I was.  At least enough to want to occasionally try my hand at it.  What I’ve found out about it is that it’s hard work, and you have to put a lot of effort in to get any good.  If I can at least do this occasionally, maybe I’ll get marginally better over time.
    • Make something handy or crafty.  This is currently a just-in-case option that I don’t think I’ll be making much use of for the time being, but it falls under the umbrella of doing a craft, or building something decorative or of utility that takes time, energy, supplies, and some level of craftsmanship.  Making a duct tape wallet, making a cutting board, or even playing a song on a musical instrument (of which I currently have no expertise in any instrument).  So, yeah.  Probably a ways off on this one.
  • Finish the “bible” for the novel I’m working on by the end of this month.
    I just started piecing together a comprehensive, up to date version of a bible I had created for a series of stories I’ve been thinking about for far too long.  I’m intending it to have multiple arcs and parts, and figured I’d build up as much of that world as I can retain and put it somewhere I can access it later.  It should contain characters, plot elements, themes, and setting notes that will hopefully allow me to keep things straight as I proceed.  Once it’s done, I’ll start working in earnest on the first novel.
  • Participate in 24-Hour Comics Day this year (October 1).
    I tried this once a few years ago, and failed miserably.  Not entirely shameful, when you consider that the goal is creating a 24-page comic in 24 hours.  At this point, I’ve at least got an idea of what to expect, and hopefully can drum up some moral support and motivation by reaching out to others this year.  I think at this point I’ll need to keep it to simple drawings of simple plots and themes.  And I’ll need lots of caffeine.
  • Participate in NaNoWriMo in November.
    I’ve participated in National Novel Writing Month twice, in 2012 and 2013.  I failed in 2012, but managed to attain victory conditions by writing 50,000 words of a novel in 2013.  I’m hoping and planning to replicate my triumph from three years ago, hopefully in the pursuit of this novel.
  • Start pitching a draft of my novel to agents and/or publishers by year’s end.
    By this point, if I’ve stayed on task, I should have at least a few chapters written and can start trying to shop this story out to potential venues for publication.  I don’t know if I’ll go looking for an agent, try smaller publishers independently, or try to self-publish.  I’m already starting to think about this, but the important thing is that I try to get my work out there.

Anyway, feel free to hold me to these goals by asking me how I’m doing with each of them.  I don’t always manage to complete the daily goal (500 words or such), but I have gotten better at it lately.  I’m hoping that by making these plans and sticking to them, I’ll start making some headway in carving out a more creative and fulfilling path for myself.

Tony’s Lists: That Which Frightens Me, Then and Now (and in the Future)

I was one of those kids in grade school.  The one who wished Halloween was a year-round thing, and that ghosts and monsters and the scares they brought were real.  When my class went to the library and most people were looking at books about cars, and cats, and Garfield and so forth, I was always the person in the folklore and mythology section, searching high and low for books that collected scary stories.  Occasionally made fun of for my predilection for horror and the macabre, I was actually mostly allowed to pursue my weird little guilty pleasure in peace.

Nowadays, with the internet and mobile computing so ubiquitous in our society, it’s easy to reach out and get a scare by doing a few quick searches, and I couldn’t be happier for it.  These days we have creepypastas, freaky image lists that can keep you awake far into the night, and even web series in addition to the horror films, books, and shows that come out with such regularity to the mass markets.  Heck, it’s not uncommon for me to fire up a list of Youtube videos about creepypastas, strange encounters on video, or other scary stories and encounters to play in the background while I work on other things.

So clearly, I’m one of those adults now.

My affinity for a good scare has come from a fertile background of horror and slasher films, scary stories, and that feeling you get when you see a particularly gruesome, life-like piece of artwork.  To that end, I’ve created a list of those things that have scared me as a kid, which give me a good little rush today, and at least one upcoming phenomenon that (I hope) should deliver a nice fright in the future when it releases.

This is by far not an exhaustive list, and I’ll have a list of honorable mentions at the end, but a nice little Top 10 (in no particular order) that I hope you’ll enjoy and comment on.

  1. Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark (book series)
    scary-stories-to-tell-in-the-dark-covers
    Okay, so maybe there’s some slight order to this list, at least where my #1 is concerned.  I just couldn’t start this list without the series of books that I discovered as a child, and whose grim, gruesome stories collected and revised by Alvin Schwartz and nightmare-fueled illustrations by Stephen Gammell caused more than a few silent gasps when I first beheld them.I’m pretty sure I’m not the only one who kept these titles circulating at the libraries when I was young, even if this series has ended up being one of the most challenged series of books in their collections (for the exact reasons listed above).  An “updated” edition was released a few years ago that swapped out Gammell’s illustrations with comparatively much tamer artwork by Brett Helquist, and while I’m sure those versions won’t be as challenged by lily-livered concerned scaredy-cats citizens, they just don’t pack the punch of the originals, and in my opinion are not worth reading.

    It’s pretty telling that, in an iHorror article just recently released about the best stories from these dark tomes (and which may or may not have served as inspiration for this list!), I thought of three particular stories that both scared the hell out of me AND were really good.  It turns out they were THE TOP THREE stories in the article.  I won’t spoil what they are (and doubtless won’t need to for many fans of this series), but I will take that as evidence that I’m both a visionary and a messed up individual.

  2. A Nightmare on Elm Street (movie series)
    Freddy 2I don’t think it helps that my first exposure to these films was A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge, where Freddy seemed particularly more vicious than I’d see in the later films (though the first classic one was also a pretty good horror film on its own thanks to Robert Englund’s performance).  Not only was he killing people in their dreams once they fell asleep–a terrifying enough premise all on its own–but he was also possessing one particular teen-aged character once he fell asleep in order to do it.  In any case, the terrifying, claw-gloved antagonist of this series would go a long way in making sure I resisted the urge to fall asleep as much as possible for many years.  It probably helps explain why I’m such an effortless night-owl by default.I’d thought I wouldn’t be able to take Freddy seriously when they made him more of a clownish killer in the later Nightmare movies, but Wes Craven’s Final Nightmare did a good job of establishing how and why this character existed, and temporarily renewed my interest in him.  I wish they would have explored that when they rebooted by series a few years ago, but unfortunately they didn’t, and I was left wanting for another good Nightmare film.  Hopefully someday, someone with the right skills can come along and make Freddy frightening again.
  3. Stephen King’s It (movie)
    Oh my wow.  Pennywise, you magnificent bastard.old-it-clownThis film, along with honorable mention Poltergeist, is no doubt responsible for more than a few people’s irrational fear of clowns, though I myself never succumbed to this.  And with Tim Curry’s simultaneously comical and vicious portrayal of the character (or rather, the main physical manifestation of said character), it became one of the movies that came quickest to mind whenever I thought about things that scared me.  A creepy… no, scratch that–terrifying clown, who you couldn’t even really kill, and who could psychically torment you across distances?  A monster in disguise made to lure children to their doom?  Yep, I’m pretty sure that’s pure, unadulterated nightmare fuel.

    But there’s also one other scene worth mentioning.  It’s one of the very few that really gave me a good jump scare when I first saw it.  Look below:

    large

    Yeah.  That may been tame by today’s standards, but it made me jump the first time I saw Bill looking through the scrapbooks and comes across this picture of his younger brother Georgie, who was just recently murdered by Pennywise.  And suddenly the picture winks at him.

    The still picture FRICKING WINKS at him!

    I jumped in fright, and I feel no shame in saying so.

  4. Spasms
    These pieces of three-dimensional nightmare fuel in the form of a Halloween decoration you can buy (yes, seriously) are creepy enough on their own, but I first encountered these things as the featured images in connection with a creepypasta called “The Russian Sleep Experiment” (which is, on its own, a great creepy story that you should totally read if you haven’t already).  The clear intention of using the Spasm was to give an approximate visual representation of what the sleep-deprived, slowly feralizing prisoners were becoming, both in terms of their looks and their natures.

    4496
    Wanna snuggle?

    And it was very effective.  I mean, just look at the twisted little bastard.  It looks mostly human, though with some serious deformations.  The first time I saw this image, I immediately asked myself what depraved movie would have had a character like this in it?  How was that look achieved?  And oh my jeez, how the hell could I get that image out of my gorram head?

    I can’t, so here it is for all of you.

  5. Garfield: Alone (comic strips)
    hqdefaultI remember reading this series of comic strips during a week in October when I was around 10 or 11, and it was a harrowing experience to say the least.  For a comic that had had a consistent style and premise, both of which revolved around the life and antics of a surly, lazy cat and his companions, this abrupt shift in tone and mood was unsettling from the get-go.  The premise, that Garfield was in fact a lonely, starving cat who lived in a dilapidated and crumbling house, and that his actions with Jon and Odie in the warm, well-kept abode readers had come to know are merely the self-delusions of an individual suffering from starvation and extreme denial, left an indelible mark on my appreciation for Jim Davis to tell a good horror story when he wanted to.There’s an article by Chris Sims on Comics Alliance that I pretty much try to re-post every October on my Facebook, and he breaks down the specifics of why this series of comic strips is so effective and frightening far better than I could.  I highly recommend you read it if you want to know more about this series of strips, if for no other reason than he includes the entirety of their run in his article.
  6. Night Terrors (mobile game)
    This one’s not out yet, so I don’t have much to say about it, other than it looks to be frightening as hell, and I’m really excited for it.

    game-night-terrors-can-turn-your-house-into-a-terrifying-arena
    Click here for a video demo… if you dare…

    As much as I am a gamer, and a fan of horror, I actually don’t play very many horror video games.  I’ve seen a few of them, and even played a couple (Slender: The Arrival and Five Nights at Freddie’s being a couple of semi-recent examples) from time to time, but I can’t claim to really want to play them very often.  I guess there are limits to the extent I want to immerse myself in that particular medium.  Maybe that will be the case for this one as well, but some reviewers’ claims that this is “Pokemon GO for horror fans” guarantees that I’ll at least check this one out.

  7. The Thing on the Doorstep (short story)
    strandedinsalem-thethingonthedoorstep2This isn’t the most famous of HP Lovecraft’s stories, and certainly suffers at times from his tendency to over-verbalize, but this first exposure to his works instilled in me both a love for the writer and a visceral sense of terror at this story’s premise.  It mostly comes down to the central premise about the story being about possession, and the extremes of one particular entity’s willingness to take over the bodies of others, but there are other elements and themes of this story that creep me out as well.  That this little gem of a horror story both begins and ends with the author’s imprisonment in a mental facility leaves the reader more than a little discomfited at the entire experience, which is exactly how you should feel when reading Lovecraft.  Well done, Mr. Lovecraft.  Well done.
  8. Exploring haunted locations
    A thing that I sometimes do is grab a friend after reading an article about haunted locations and going and exploring to see what we can find.  I don’t think I’ve ever found anything overtly paranormal or supernatural, but there have been one or two experiences that I haven’t been able to fully explain, and they certainly chilled my bones at the time.  Below is a picture and link to a video I made when my sister and I went to Spaghetti Warehouse in downtown Houston.13095976_10154134572918899_3850412281435318771_n
  9. Horror film remakes
    ImageIn the last decade or so, there have been a slew of remakes of old horror films that have really driven home the scares.  Not that the originals aren’t perfectly hair-raising on their own–I can recall more than a few of them keeping me up at night–but the sheer level of visceral terror involved in such films as Rob Zombie’s 2007 remake of Halloween and Fede Alvarez’s 2013 reimagining of The Evil Dead just make it seem like the creators were really out to get moviegoers.  There’s also no doubt that with the advances in movie effects, films such as these are ripe for an upgrade.
  10. Slenderman (egregore), and Marble Hornets (web series)
    Slendy 2I pretty much couldn’t close out this list without mentioning Slenderman (a.k.a. the Slender Man), whose emergence onto the internet and into the collective consciousness of a generation has been both fascinating and horrifying to behold.  The unnaturally tall, thin, blanked-faced character dressed in a black suit tends to stalk, abduct, and otherwise traumatize people, disrupting video feeds and often causing others to disappear without a trace.  Having only graced the internet with his presence since 2009, Slenderman is a very new phenomenon that demonstrates just how powerful a well-conceptualized image and premise can be online.It’s Slenderman’s fame in particular that intrigues me, as he’s basically gone from a nonexistent thing that has no influence on the world to a nonexistent thing that now exists very strongly in the minds of others, and who very arguably influences the world in which he doesn’t exist, fitting the definition of an egregore.  This is very evident not only in the number of stories, creepypastas, artworks, video games, and other multimedia in which the character continues to pop up, but also in the unfortunate attempted murder of a young girl in Waukesha, Wisconsin in 2014.  Her classmates believed the Slenderman to be real, and that by murdering their classmate, they would become his proxies.

    marble hornetsClosely related to Slenderman is the web series Marble Hornets, which utilized the mythos surrounding the character as a framework for them to create a horror series.  While there are several very unnerving shots of the Slenderman (known as the Operator in the series) throughout the 90 or so short episodes, many of the series’ scares rely on what isn’t seen, or at the very least more conventional horror tropes, such as being attacked by a man in a mask.  This has the effect of making the times the Operator does appear to be that much more significant and frightening.

Honorable Mentions: Stranger Things (Netflix Orginal series), Berserk (anime and manga by Kentaro Miura), Poltergeist (movie), The Shining (movie, 1980).

Fandoms: Learn to Play In the Sandbox Together, or Get the Hell Out

Don’t expect to insult my fandom to promote yours and expect we’ll be friends for very long.

There.  I needed to say that, and get the venom out.

I like to think I’m a pretty accepting person, all things considered.  I prefer Marvel comics to DC comics for the most part, though I’m perfectly willing to acknowledge when certain DC stories get things right that Marvel either doesn’t or hasn’t in some time.  I like both Star Wars and Star Trek, and don’t understand why people have to choose one or the other.  I like Doctor Who at certain stretches, and am not so hot on it for others.  I love Firefly.

And there are plenty of other fandoms I like.  There are fandoms I’m not so hot on.  There are plenty of fandoms I just haven’t had the opportunity to explore, and may or may not discover in the future.  And I’m fine with all of those things.

You like My Little Pony?  Wonderful.  It’s not my cup of tea, but it works for you, and that’s what’s important.

But one thing I’m not okay with?  Don’t ever insult my fandom to try to make yours seem better.  I will knock you flat on your ass if you do so.

Lately I’ve seen a lot of material online that denigrates Marvel and simultaneously extols DC.  Tawdry, sensationalistic, clickbait-y headlines and memes that use the Us vs. Them premise to lure readers into their pointless and often terribly written content.  Typically, when I see dreck such as this, I generally just roll my eyes and keep going.  But lately I’ve seen enough of it, as well as re-postings of it from people I actually care about, that it’s starting to impinge on my overall enjoyment of my fandom.

This, friends, is not acceptable.

does-marvel-appreciate-their-fans-more-than-dcI’m not one to go around starting fights.  I prefer Marvel to DC, but again, I’m willing to give them credit when and where it’s due.  More importantly, I’m actually rooting for the DCEU to be as successful as the MCU, even though I think they are far behind in terms of execution at this point.  I want them to have a tentpole franchise they can be proud of.  I am not willing to lower myself into a mudslinging fight that we see so often, both online and in pop culture forums, where one side is yelling “MARVEL SUCKS!” and the other is yelling “DC SUCKS!” as loud as they can.  It’s pointless and puerile, and I want no part of it.

And I expect the same treatment from those around me.

You want to think Marvel sucks and DC buries it?  Go ahead.  Think it all you want.  But the moment you open your mouth and say something to that effect and insult my fandom, you and I are going to have problems.

It’s fine if you prefer DC to Marvel.  It works better for you, and Marvel works better for me.  There’s no reason to start insulting the other.  It’s a big, wide, wonderful world, and there’s plenty of room in the sandbox for everyone to play.  I don’t understand why people feel the need to tear others down in order to make themselves feel better, but one thing I can do is refuse to tolerate it.

So consider this a warning, dear reader.  You’re free to disagree with me all you want.  You don’t have to like what I like, so long as you express your disagreement respectfully.  I will never trash talk your fandom or franchise, and I think it’s not asking too much to expect the same from others.

The moment you put a foot out of line and spew bile all over a thing I hold dear, you can expect to be warned, once.  After that, if you continue, expect that I will censor the hell out of you.

It’s not about having a different opinion.  It’s about being able to disagree like adults.  If you don’t know how to do that, don’t expect me to hold your hand.

I’ll just show you the door.english-idioms-show-the-door-300x194

Oh, and one addendum: this cuts both ways.  Marvel fans insulting DC fans, for example, will also be shown the door.

Play nice, everyone, with everyone.

Suicide Squad Inspires Wide Range of Reactions, Thoughts About Film Reviews

To be honest, the most intriguing characteristic of Suicide Squad, the film of DC villain misfits cobbled together to serve a kind of black ops kill squad for the government, is the wide-ranging spectrum of feedback it has received, and the fallout that’s resulted from it.  The film itself, while not particularly remarkable, makes for an entertaining, serviceable-enough action romp that’s garnered itself the dubious distinction of being a more watchable part of the emerging DC Extended Universe than its two predecessors, 2013’s Man of Steel, and this year’s Orphan Fight: The Movie, aka, Batman vs. Superman.longrange061015-860x450_c
After watching this film on Thursday and taking the rest of the weekend to simply scroll through all the reactions to it, I find myself mystified by a number of developments around it.  Off the top of my head, here are a few of them.

  1. This movie does not deserve all the hate it’s been getting.
    I know I’m not the only one to say this, and the weekend box office projections will certainly back that up, but it looks like Suicide Squad is going to break records despite the sheer ferocity with it’s been attacked by critics from all sides.  I’ve seen terrible review after terrible review, roundly lambasting it for its flaws–of which, make no mistake, it has quite a few–but rarely giving it credit for the things it manages to get right, or dismissively glossing them over when mentioned at all.  An actual viewing of the actual film leaves me with the impression that some critics are all too eager to see this film fail, and are giving it much shorter shrift than it deserves.

    However, by the same token…

  2. Critics are not beholden to justify their ratings or placate fans.
    Okay, wow.

    I realize Rotten Tomatoes isn’t without its critics and detractors.  I realize that fans will want to defend a film they want to succeed–and it’s clearly the fans who are making Suicide Squad successful, which I wholly endorse.  But starting a petition to shut down a website whose stated purpose is to rate and critique films that are released is taking things waaaaay too far.

    Film critics and reviewers, while they can tend to see a film through a lens that can at times paint them as snobbish or pretentious, are, at the end of the day, individuals commenting on a movie, the same as you and me.  Rotten Tomatoes itself doesn’t rate films–it collects the many reviews it gets from its film critics and uses an algorithm to determine the movie’s score from those reviews.  Bottom line: it’s a tool that gathers data, crunches numbers, and spits out a rating.  If you have a problem with the score given to Suicide Squad, you have a problem with the individual critics who reviewed it negatively–not Rotten Tomatoes itself.  This is an important distinction to realize if you want to be taken seriously.

    With that said, it’s important to realize that film reviewers are not required to change their opinions just because fans may disagree with them.  I’ve seen fan after fan repeat the line I heard during BvS‘s critical drubbing, that Disney/Marvel was paying money to critics to intentionally sink DC films, so that they wouldn’t be able to compete with Marvel’s own films from the MCU.  There is no evidence that this has ever been true, and until shown otherwise, there’s no reason to give any consideration to such wild accusations.  Fans can disagree–vehemently, if they wish–with a reviewer’s opinion, and state as much, but after that, the safest move they can make is to walk away in disgust.

  3. The movie itself is perfectly watchable.
    And finally, I’m at the review itself.

    Suicide Squad is an enjoyable, fun film, with a talented cast and decent direction.  It does indeed suffer from a few issues–it’s unevenly paced, the villain ends up being lackluster, and there are a few supporting characters who may as well not even have been there.  None of this, however, undercuts the basic premise of the movie, which is to grab a few DC villains, throw them all together against a big bad threat, and have some fun while doing it.

    Margot Robbie, Will Smith, and Viola Davis are the standouts in this outing by far.  Robbie’s Harley Quinn without a doubt is having the most fun, and we get to see bits and pieces of her journey from Dr. Harleen Quinzel to the Joker’s main squeeze, Harley.  It’s an entertaining performance of material that is somewhat two dimensionaly written, and she brings the charm and snark with aplomb.  Will Smith’s Deadshot, surprisingly, ends up being the character through whose eyes we see the most of the plot, and identify with the most.  He’s the most heroic of an unheroic bunch, playing the straight man whose past has caught up to him in a believable fashion.  Viola Davis also turns in an amazing performance as Amanda Waller, the boss from hell who is determined to control anything and everything about her newly-formed task force.  She plays the part of cool, manipulative superior with all the magnificent bastardry that fans of the comics would expect from this character, and is impossible not to watch in every scene she is in.  The writing isn’t the best in this film, but it’s easy to see that the actors did everything they could with what they had, and I commend them for their collective efforts.

    Special mention goes to Jay Hernandez’s character, El Diablo, who is played with quiet solemnity until a particularly badass moment in the story’s climax.

    While the story tends to give the most focus to these characters, we get a few inclusions that make you wonder why they even showed up.  One character seems to only be there for the purpose of showing how severe the punishment is for trying to escape the arrangement set up by Amanda Waller.  Another character, Captain Boomerang, feels like the only reason he exists is to give an almost literal 2-second cameo to another character, and Killer Croc, Katana, while the remaining characters are given virtually no development.  I realize this isn’t easy to do in a film with this many people, but it still feels like we’re left wanting.

    The villain ends up being another nominal member of the group who goes rogue, and I can’t get over how forgettable she ends up being.  While there are a lot of nice visuals and special effects centered around this character, there’s also plenty of confusion as to how she’s able to break free on her own, as well as a lack of depth to her character that keeps her from standing out among the legion of movie villains with generic motivations.

    Plot-wise, it’s pretty easy to follow.  We get a series of origin stories as the main characters are introduced, fun to watch for their visual flair.  As the team goes on its first mission, things change in terms of tone and pacing, jarring viewers as the squad ends up fighting monsters sent forth by the villain.  There are moments of humor mixed in with the action, and while the plot spirals into your standard boss battle finale, it’s carried through with enough irreverance to be satisfying.

    You might notice I’ve said nothing about Jared Leto’s Joker until now, and it’s because I don’t feel he belongs in this story.  This Joker is decent enough, I suppose, but he’s mostly outside of the narrative, and should have stayed confined to Harley’s flashback origins.  We may get to see more of him in a future movie, but I feel like he’s both underused and entirely unnecessary to the plot.

    All in all, this is a film that wants to have fun, and does manage to succeed in a few places.  It’s not the homerun I’m sure Warner Bros. wants it to be, but it’s by no means a bad film either.  However, in comparison to BvS, and I would argue Man of Steel, it’s leaps and bounds ahead where tone and overall enjoyment are concerned.  Hopefully as the DCEU moves forward, its films will get increasingly more entertaining and memorable.  Suicide Squad is definitely a step in the right direction, even if it doesn’t quite succeed at the level to which it aspires.

In this age of the internet and social media in which we live, it’s more important than ever we keep vigilant about the headlines we see.  As Suicide Squad has shown, it’s very possible that you’ll experience something very different than what you read about or research yourself.

Impromptu Resolution: No Mobile Games on My Phone for a Month

A little over a week ago, something fortuitous happened to me.  While I was out with my family, playing Pokemon GO at one of the public parks, my phone ran out of power.  When I tried to restart it later that night, I found that it was effectively bricked.  The thing wouldn’t progress past the initial startup screen, no matter what I tried.  I couldn’t even get it to do a factory reset (one of my housemates was able to get it to that point where it at least asked to do one, but it still wouldn’t do anything other than go to the startup screen).

We ordered a replacement, and I’m happy to say that my new phone works at least as well as its predecessor before it bricked.  The bad news was that I lost most of my apps, and some of my contact information data (note to self: go through and make ALL contacts Google contacts).  So, I’ve been reloading apps and re-customizing my phone back to the way I had it, more or less.

One thing that I noticed was that I had lost all of the games I tend to spend a disproportionate amount of time on–Pokemon GO, of course, being one of them.  But I also spend or have spent a lot of time (and money) and other mobile games, mostly from the Marvel side of the universe.  Marvel Contest of Champions, Marvel Future Fight, Avengers Academy, Marvel Avengers Alliance (1 and 2), and Marvel Puzzle Quest.  You might say I like my Marvel fix.

Since I’d already gone several days without playing these time (and money) sinks without the world imploding in on me, I figured this was an opportunity to see how things would play out if I simply didn’t load any games onto my phone.  My phone is with me all the time, in my pocket, unlike my other mobile devices and computers,  so I figured I could load the games on to those other devices if I really wanted to play them.  So far, I’m proud to say that I haven’t.  And for the moment, I’ve resolved that I will go one full month–30 whole days–without putting any games on this new phone.

It’s been said that where we tend to put our time, money, and energy says a lot about how committed we are to other aspects of our lives.  I know that, over the years, I’ve put a lot of time, a great deal of energy, and more money than I’d like to admit into these mobile distractions that are so slickly marketed to the public.  And don’t get me wrong: I love games, and I’m pretty sure I always will.  But I’m also a fan of trying to improve my life, be it in the realm of physical health, career, or creativity, and it’s impossible to deny that time put into gaming will, at some point, necessarily detract from my time in these other areas.

Maybe by keeping them off my phone for a few weeks, I can blunt my addiction to them and give myself an opportunity to level up in other aspects of my life.

In any case, we’ll see!

 

Batman: the Killing Joke – Don’t Believe Everything the Naysayers Write

Batman enthusiasts may have recently noticed a controversial headline or two about the highly anticipated home video release of Batman: the Killing Joke. Starring the beloved voice talents of Kevin Conroy and Mark Hamill, this classic story was hailed as one of the seminal tales of the Batman mythos in the 1980s, and is credited with moving the Dark Knight into dark territory with its violent plot and surprisingly tragic (possible) backstory given to the Joker. One of the most impactful developments in the story involves the crippling of Barbara Gordon, who up until this story had been Batgirl, and whose horrific treatment at the hands of the Joker lays the groundwork for her eventual rebirth as the wheelchair-bound superhero, Oracle.

Right before the film’s release, news websites began posting about a significant change to the character of Barbara Gordon in the animated film, particularly involving her relationship with Batman. Cast as a problematic and unwelcome development, the news centered around the introduction of Barbara, as Batgirl, having a sexual relationship with Batman during the course of the film. Taken as is, these headlines could easily leave Batfans in a state of acute pique, especially any source material purists who don’t recall any cannon relationship between the two of them.

At first, I jumped on the bandwagon that mocked and rolled its collective eyes at this news. Many of my friends reacted, making statements to the effect that Barbara couldn’t possibly have any worth in this story unless she was a damsel in distress to give Batman some man pain to motivate him to fight the Joker. And, at first, I joined them.

After having seen The Killing Joke in theaters this week, I’m of the opinion that the first third of the film, which is told from Barbara’s perspective, is a problematic but ultimately necessary subversion of the original story by Alan Moore. After it moves into the conflict between Batman and the Joker, Barbara is essentially abandoned after the Joker shoots, cripples, and sexually violates her. She is effectively a prop, an easy example of Women in Refrigerators whose sole function is to raise the stakes for the men in the story.

Isn’t that a biting indictment of a story? Barbara gets mutilated, and the story is not even about her.

In hindsight, Alan Moore holds no love for this event, if his interviews are to be believed. Of the contrarian opinion that The Killing Joke isn’t a very good story of his, he also mentions that DC editorial’s decision to let him cripple Barbara was a mistake, one where they should have “reined [him] in,” but failed to do so.

The Killing Joke, as Alan Moore wrote it, is essentially about Batman and the Joker, and to a lesser degree, about Jim Gordon. It’s not about Barbara, her struggles as Batgirl, or even her triumphant attainment of the Oracle mantle. Yet it’s absolutely integral to her evolution as a character, because of what is done to her. For that reason alone, I don’t take issue with the film creators’ decision to inject her perspective into the beginning of the narrative. Given the enormity and tragedy of what is inflicted on her in the course of this story, this deserves to be her story, too.

With all of that said, however…

I think the decision to make Barbara infatuated with Batman didn’t do the character any favors. It’s the sole, stark issue I have with this part of the story, for a number of reasons. Comic book continuity aside, Barbara has never struck me as a person who needed Bruce or Batman to complete her identity as a person; she had always been an independent, resourceful woman whose inexperience was often counterbalanced by her cleverness and intelligence. The idea that she would pine after her mentor in crimefighting—her “yoga instructor,” as she codes to her gay best friend when dishing about guys—is also more than a little disturbing.

the-killing-joke-batgirlHowever, with that said, I like a lot of the other issues raised by this part of the story. Barbara’s exploration of her role as a crimefighter takes a compelling turn when the nephew of one of the mob bosses becomes obsessed with her. She scoffs, like I would guess any young vigilante would, when Batman tells her she’s not taking a dangerous situation seriously enough. Her enthusiasm balances her uncertainty, with which she does struggle in a believable fashion. What her mentor thinks of her, what lengths criminals will go to in order to get what they want, how she handles stress and surprises in their line of work—these are all issues she encounters, and deals with in ultimately relatable ways. It’s only when the romantic/sexual/infatuation elements come into play that things come off as contrived or off-putting.

In short, I think the headlines many websites and publications used to sensationalize this development were misleading and manipulated to generate clicks. Surprise, surprise, I know. But I think anyone who was excited about this movie and then put off of it because of the headlines owes it to themselves to see it for themselves. I myself was guilty of judging the film based on those headlines, and while I won’t rate The Killing Joke as one of the best animated Batman films I’ve seen, it’s certainly nowhere near as bad as the naysayers would have you believe.

maxresdefaultThere is, of course, more to this film than the changes that were made to the story, and I’m giving them such short shrift because, for the most part, they’re fine, and we all know what to expect from them. The script is nearly line for line accurate to the comic, and the animation and voice acting is all top-notch. I even didn’t realize in the original comic that Joker actually sings during one phase of his tormenting the elder Gordon. It’s certainly not a bad adaptation. I just happen to think the changes surrounding Barbara’s character are the most significant part of the story, and that they bring both positive and negative elements to bare upon the narrative.

It’s definitely worth a watch, if for no other reason than as a lesson that you can’t always trust the headlines you see on the internet.

My Dirty Little 4th of July Secret

I always feel like the odd man out when it comes to the Fourth of July among my friends and family, at least when it comes to one seemingly quintessential part of celebrating this holiday.

I’m all for most of the normal things you do on the Fourth: grilling up and consuming hamburgers and hot dogs, making the kids watch Independence Day (because hey, what other reason do we celebrate this holiday for, if not kicking alien butt?), even the occasional parade doesn’t bother me too much–depending on just how merciless the Houston sun and heat decide to be, of course.  I can absorb all the requisite flag waving and nationalistic jingoism on this day pretty painlessly, because again, it’s all about celebrating the USA.  Right?

But there is one much beloved aspect of this holiday that I pretty much can’t stand.  And if you haven’t guessed it by process of elimination yet, you should be able to figure it out from the picture below.

fireworks
Image source: piquaoh.org

Yep, fireworks.  I am not a fan, never have been, and I don’t see how I ever will be.

Now, let me clarify.  The above image isn’t entirely accurate, and the reason it isn’t is because fireworks like the display posted above are a-okay with me.  They’re pretty, they’re far away, they’re (hopefully) viewed from a safe distance, and they’re part of a show that’s intended for the public.  I’m alright with all of these things, in theory.

Where I get a lot less cozy with the concept of fireworks is with regard to the other kind of fireworks activities Americans tend to get involved with so much: the store bought, bring them home and light them up in your driveway and/or backyard variety.  So many of my friends and family look so forward to this part of the holiday, spending small heaps of money on bundles upon bundles of sparklers, smoke bombs, firecrackers, and who knows how many other kinds of pyrocentric indulgences, that sometimes I’ve wondered if I’m some kind of genetic freak, someone who just doesn’t have the DNA sequences that allow humans to appreciate this sort of thing.  With rare exceptions, most people to whom I’ve confessed this tend to drop their jaws and cock their heads to the side, as if there’s no way that could possibly be the Tony they’ve known for so long.

But it’s true.  I’m no fan of back yard fireworks.  Hell, given the choice, I’d much rather go hide in my room with the frightened animals and play video games rather than take part in fireworks on the lawn or driveway, no matter where I am.

My reasons can be many, or all boiled down to a simple dislike of up close and personal pyrotechnics, but here are the ones that jump immediately to mind:

  • They are loud;
  • They are unpredictable, meaning some of them can propel themselves almost anywhere;
  • They positively wreak of sulfur;
  • The mess is not something I look forward to seeing, or cleaning up, ever;
  • How expensive are these things?

Enjoying fireworks displays from far off is one thing.  Having them in your own yard is a far less pleasant proposition, at least in my mind.  It’s difficult for me not to see them as invaders of my space and property, even when my household isn’t actually lighting them off, because enough of our neighbors do that the effects are virtually identical.

But hey, don’t mind me.  I’ll just be hiding in my room, playing Plants vs. Zombies or one of the LEGO games.

Happy Independence Day!

Star Trek Is Losing Its Luster With Me Lately

I’m a man of many fandoms, some of which are popularly considered diametrically opposed to one another.  I’ve been a Trekkie for the larger part of my life, when I started watching Star Trek: the Next Generation in high school, though my association with the franchise goes back even further due to my mother being an old school Trekkie.  I can remember her emotional reaction to Wrath of Khan back when I couldn’t have been much older than a toddler.

I’ve enjoyed Star Trek on and off over the years.  TNG was great, Deep Space Nine would go on to become my favorite Star Trek of all time, and even Voyager and Enterprise would have (very) occasional episodes that made me happy.  The movies were of varying qualities, particularly the ones featuring the TNG cast, though I thought the 2009 reboot was a refreshing take on the franchise.  Into Darkness… let’s not go into that one right now.

Lately though, there have been developments that have really given me pause about whether I want to continue calling myself a Trekkie.  The first of these is the upcoming 2017 series that was recently announced.  The big drawback for me at this point is that it will only be accessible if you pony up the $5.99 per month for CBS’s video-on-demand streaming service, which at this point they’re calling CBS All-Access.  Call it whatever you want, it’s basically a Netflix streaming clone that they’re trying to force Trekkies to subscribe to by making the show exclusive to this service.

Annoying as such an obvious and cynical money-grab is, I at least understand it.  I can understand wanting to try to make money on a potentially very lucrative delivery service like streaming.  But it’s the next issue that really sharpens my bat’leth.

The new fan film guidelines that CBS and Paramount have issued have been met with criticism and open hostility in some cases, and it’s really hard for me to think the rancor isn’t well deserved.  It seems that, in order to avoid legal action from CBS and Paramount when you make a Star Trek fan film, you have to follow their list of (mostly) insane rules, such as restrictions on film length and number of episodes, purchase of officially licensed props or clothing in films, and the inability to use any professionals or former Star Trek cast or crew on fan productions.

Fan backlash has been immediate and loud, and while there’s been some effort to explain or defend these guidelines, it’s hard to argue that they don’t leave a pretty bitter taste in the mouths of fans who have for years labored on these projects out of love for the franchise.  I myself am not involved in fan films, but I can sympathize with the resentment that comes with being creatively shackled by corporate “guidelines” from on high.

How they’ll play out remains to be seen, though I wouldn’t expect to see much effort from fans to hide their contempt.  If I’ve learned anything about Trekkies over the years, it’s that we’re a passionate, outspoken, and resourceful bunch, and when we feel screwed over we’ll fight back.

maxresdefault

At present I have no plans to subscribe to CBS All-Access for this new series, though I’ll admit that could change as more information becomes available.  The only reason I’m going to see Star Trek Beyond in theaters at this point is my sympathy and respect for Anton Yelchin and his recent tragic end.  But at this point it seems the corporate entity in charge of Star Trek doesn’t have the decency to even pretend to respect its fans, and that comes through prominently in these most recent developments.

I haven’t turned in my Trekkie badge yet, but if things like this continue, it’s only a matter of time.